Tom Lane writes:
> I think it'd be a good idea to change the code so that SIGQUIT is the
> per-backend quickdie() signal, not SIGUSR1, to bring the postmaster and
> backend signals back into some semblance of agreement.
I think we agreed on this already when someone wanted to use a signal for
synchronizing "near-committers". Still seems like a good idea.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
