Tom Lane wrote: > But none of these fully explain Mark's problem. If we knew where the > "syntax error 25 : -> ." came from, we'd be closer to an answer. After scanning the source for "syntax error", line 126 of backend/bootstrap/bootscanner.l seems to be the likely culprit. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remainder of .sig suppressed to conserve scarce California electrons... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- [HACKERS] porting question: funky uid names? Mark Bixby
- Re: [HACKERS] porting question: funky uid names? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] porting question: funky uid names? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] porting question: funky uid names? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] porting question: funky uid na... Mark Bixby
- Re: [HACKERS] porting question: funky ui... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] porting question: fun... Mark Bixby
- Re: [HACKERS] porting question:... Mark Bixby
- Re: [HACKERS] porting question:... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] porting quest... Mark Bixby
- Re: [HACKERS] porting quest... Tom Lane