Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010315 09:35] wrote:
>> BTW, are there any platforms where O_DSYNC exists but has a different
>> spelling?
> Yes, FreeBSD only has: O_FSYNC
> it doesn't have O_SYNC nor O_DSYNC.
Okay ... we can fall back to O_FSYNC if we don't see either of the
others. No problem. Any other weird cases out there? I think Andreas
might've muttered something about AIX but I'm not sure now.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SY... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SY... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done via ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be done ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be d... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsyn... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL ... Larry Rosenman
- Testing structure (was) Re: [HA... Justin Clift
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to be d... Justin Clift
- Re: [HACKERS] Allowing WAL fsync to... Bruce Momjian
