"Mikheev, Vadim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Got it at spin.c:156 with 50 clients doing inserts into
>> 50 tables (int4, text[1-256 bytes]).
>> -B 16384, -wal_buffers=256 (with default others wal params).
> SpinAcquire() ... but on which lock?
After a little bit of thought I'll bet it's ControlFileLockId.
Likely we shouldn't be using a spinlock at all for that, but the
short-term solution might be a longer timeout for this particular lock.
Alternatively, could we avoid holding that lock while initializing a
new log segment?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
