Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to get some evidence at hand - could some owners of
> different platforms compile and run the attached little C
> source please?
HPUX 10.20:
Pipe buffer is 8192 bytes
Sys-V message queue buffer is 16384 bytes
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- [HACKERS] Re: Performance monitor signal han... Thomas Swan
- [HACKERS] Re: Performance monitor signal... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal handler Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal han... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal... Giles Lean
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor s... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor signal... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monitor s... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monit... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monit... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monit... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Performance monit... Bruce Momjian
