Re: [HACKERS] beta6 pg_restore core dumps

[Tom Lane]

Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Considering that the data we are working with is binary, and may contain
>> nulls, any code that insisted on null-termination would probably be ipso
>> facto broken.

> But we're not; this is the same code that sends the COPY output back to PG.

Oh, isn't this the code that pushes large-object bodies around?  I
should think the problem would've been noticed much sooner if not...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly