Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> cvs annotate is a really, really handy tool, unfortunetly these
> indent runs remove this very useful tool as well as do a major job
> of obfuscating the code changes.
I think this is a good reason for *not* applying pgindent on an
incremental basis, but only once per release cycle. That at least
lets cvs annotate be useful within a cycle.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
