Re: [ADMIN] Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

[Tom Lane]

Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If it for pgmonitor then you guys ought to just mark it broken on
> these platforms, the non-"ps based" solution could have been
> implemented with all the time wasted trying to get the "ps based"
> hack working. :(

My thoughts exactly ;-) ... I'm willing to give advice about this,
but not to do any legwork myself.

PS status display does have some utility with or without pgmonitor,
but not enough to do a lot of work for.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html