The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think we've got to remove that failing horology test before we wrap RC3. > can we comment out the test for now, so that its still in there, but not > tested? or is there absolutely non way that we can fix that in the long > term? Commenting it out was the only idea that I had. Maybe Thomas has a better idea, though. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] logging is funny... Fouad Fezzi
- Re: [HACKERS] logging is funny... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packa... Mathijs Brands
- RE: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: All's quiet ... RC3 p... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: All's quiet ... RC3 p... Martín Marqués
- Re: [HACKERS] All's quiet ... RC3 packaging... Tom Lane