Bruce Momjian wrote: > That's a tough call. We already have some duplicate type symbols, but > this is not a standard SQL type. I would see if we can get others to > say it is a good idea. But the DOUBLE keyword is already reserved by ANSI for use in the "DOUBLE PRECISION" type, so a "DOUBLE" synonym for it shouldn't make much of a difference. Right? - Mark Butler ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
- [HACKERS] Re: Hand written parsers Mark Butler
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Hand written parsers Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Hand written parsers Nathan Myers
- [HACKERS] Howard Williams
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Hand written parsers Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Hand written pars... Bruce Guenter
- Re: [HACKERS] Yacc / Bison difficulties Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Yacc / Bison difficulties Mark Butler
- Re: [HACKERS] Yacc / Bison difficulties Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Yacc / Bison difficulties Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Yacc / Bison difficulties Mark Butler
- Re: [HACKERS] Yacc / Bison difficulties Tom Lane