Bruce Momjian wrote:

> That's a tough call.  We already have some duplicate type symbols, but
> this is not a standard SQL type.  I would see if we can get others to
> say it is a good idea.

But the DOUBLE keyword is already reserved by ANSI for use in the "DOUBLE
PRECISION" type, so a "DOUBLE" synonym for it shouldn't make much of a
difference. Right?

 - Mark Butler

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl

Reply via email to