Michael Ansley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry for my forgetfulness (and a search through geocrawler didn't turn up
> anything useful), but what was the problem with something like NOWAIT?
> e.g.: SELECT * FROM a FOR UPDATE NOWAIT;
> where, if the required lock could not be obtained immediately, this
> statement would raise an error.
I have no objection to that ... it does not cover anything except FOR
UPDATE, though, which is probably less general than some of the other
folks want.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Bruce Momjian
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: timeout on lock feat... Henryk Szal
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Michael Ansley
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Mikheev, Vadim
- AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] timeout on lock featurey Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feat... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] timeout on lock... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] timeout on ... Nathan Myers
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] timeout on lock feature Bruce Momjian
