Folks: I'm planning a port of Postgres to a multiprocessor architecture in which all nodes have both local memory and fast access to a shared memory. Shared memory it more expensive than local memory. My intent is to put the shmem & lock structures in shared memory, but use a copy-in / copy-out approach to maintain coherence in the buffer cache: - copy buffer from shared memroy on buffer allocate - write back buffer to shared memory when it is dirtied. Is that enough ? The idea sketch is as follows (mostly, changes contained in storage/buffer/bufmgr.c): -change BufferAlloc, etc, to create a node-local copy of the buffer (from shared memory). Copy both the BufferDesc entry and the buffer->data array -change WriteBuffer to copy the (locally changed) buffer to shared memory (this is the point in which the BM_DIRTY bit is set). [ I am assuming the buffer is locked & this is a safe time to make the buffer visible to other backends]. [Assume, for this discussion, that the sem / locks structs in shared memory have been ported & work ]. Ditto for the hash access. My concern is whether that is enough to maintain consistency in the buffer cache (i.e, are there other places in the code where a backend might have a leftover pointer to somewhere in the buffer cache ? ) Because, in the scheme above, the buffer cache is not directly accessible to the backend except via this copy in / copy -out approach. [BTW, I think this might be a way of providing a 'cluster' version of Postgers, by using some global communication module to obtain/post the 'buffer cache' values] thanks regards Mauricio Mauricio Breternitz Jr, Ph.D. Times N Systems Inc. 1908 Kramer Ln, Braker Building B, Suite P Austin, TX 78758 phone (512) 977 5368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mauricio Breternitz Jr, Ph.D. Times N Systems Inc. 1908 Kramer Ln, Braker Building B, Suite P Austin, TX 78758 phone (512) 977 5368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html