Thomas Lockhart writes: > Nothing serious, but I would like to apply a patch to allow IDENT > strings (e.g. 'hour') to be accepted by the SQL92 EXTRACT() function. We > accept those for date_part(), which is what EXTRACT() is translated to > by the parser, and it seems to be a reasonable to the standard. But why does that need to go into 7.1.1? -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
- [HACKERS] v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesd... bpalmer
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesd... Jan Wieck
- [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesd... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on T... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on T... Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and released ... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and relea... Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and ... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched and r... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1.1 branched ... Thomas Lockhart
- date conversion (was Re: [HACK... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: date convers... Thomas Lockhart
- [BUGS] Re: [HACKERS] Re: d... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: date con... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesd... Tom Lane
