> > Yes, I like that idea, but the problem is that it is hard to update just > > one table in the file. > > why not have just one ever-growing file that is only appended to and > that has > lines of form > > OID, type (DB/TABLE/INDEX/...), name, time > > so when you need tha actual info you grep for name and use tha last line > whose > file actually exists. Not too convenient but useful enough when you > really need it. Yes, that is one idea, but it is hard to undo a change. You would have to write to the file only on a commit. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conve... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conve... Casey Lyon
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conve... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conve... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conve... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conve... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conve... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conve... Casey Lyon
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conve... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conve... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conve... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conve... B. Palmer
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Casey Lyon
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conventions, and count... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conventions, and count() Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conventions, and count... Alfred Perlstein