On Wed, 2 May 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What parts of the changes would require an initdb, would new > > functions need to be added or the index ops need to change or would > > it be fixes to the existing functions (if the latter, wouldn't a recompile > > and dropping/recreating the indexes be enough?) > > Yes, dropping and recreating any user indexes that contain the problematic > values would be sufficient to get you out of trouble. We don't need any > system catalog changes for this, AFAICS. Looking back, I misread the original message. I thought you were saying that it needed to wait for an initdb and so would be bad in a dot release, but it was just the breaking of indexes thing, but since they're already pretty broken, I don't see much of a loss by fixing it. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
