my original CIDR type implementation used BIND's inet_ntop() and inet_pton() which therefore included latent support for ipv6. it wouldn't take a huge amount of effort to bring this back, would it? (the user below is using VARCHAR for his ip addresses for this reason.) ------- Forwarded Message Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 08:37:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Paul A Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Appliance caching server configuration database schema In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Gustafsson) Paul A. Vixie writes: > you can use INET or CIDR for your addresses since this is postgres. I would if it supported IPv6 addresses. ------- End of Forwarded Message ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
