The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2EXPLAIN SELECT distinct s.gid, s.created, count(i.title) AS images
> FROM status s LEFT JOIN images i ON (s.gid = i.gid AND i.active),
>relationship_wanted rw
> WHERE s.active AND s.status != 0
> AND EXISTS ( SELECT gid
> FROM relationship_wanted
> WHERE gender = 1 )
> AND EXISTS ( SELECT gid
> FROM personal_data
> WHERE gender = 0
> AND ( ( age('now', dob) > '26 years' ) AND (
>age('now', dob) < '46 years' ) )
> AND country IN ( 'US' ) )
> GROUP BY s.gid,s.created
> ORDER BY images desc;
I don't understand what you're trying to do here. The inner SELECTs
aren't dependent on anything in the outer query, so what are they for?
> ... status and
> personal_data have a 1-to-1 relationship,
Then why have two tables? Merge them into one table and save yourself a
join.
Also, since status.gid is (I assume) unique, what's the use of the
DISTINCT clause at the top level? Seems like that's costing you
a useless sort & unique pass ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
