On 11/1/07, Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes: > > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Perhaps both these considerations dictate providing another command or a > >> special flavor of \l instead of just modifying it? > > > > I've seen no argument made why \l should print this info at all. > > Its interesting information, but I agree that there are BIG > disadvantages to adding it to \l directly. If there's an "\lv" or > such, where it's more certain that people want extended information, > and perhaps that they have appropriate permissions.
I'd find this convenient too. Although \l+ would be more consistent with the \d series of commands. Cheers BJ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq