On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 17:25 -0700, Mark Wong wrote: > On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:20:27 -0400 > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > My question is -hackers, is who wants first bite and what do they > > > want :) > > > > Something I'd like to have back real soon is the daily DBT run against > > CVS HEAD that Mark Wong was doing at OSDL. Maybe we don't need a > > particularly enormous machine for that, but comparable runs day after > > day are real nice for noting when patches had unexpected performance > > impacts... > > I expect the processors in this system to be faster than what I was using but > this system does have about a third of the number of spindles I had > previously. In my spare time I am trying to complete a TPC-E implementation > (dbt5) to the current spec revision and it is supposed to have significantly > less disk requirements than the TPC-C derivative (dbt2) I was using in the > past. If we believe TPC-E achieved all its goals, I think it would be > appropriate to start using that as soon as the kit is ready. > > Anyway want to help with the kit? :) It's the C stored functions that need > to be revised.
Mark, Why don't you post a TODO list for TPC-E somewhere, so people can bite small pieces off of the list. I'm sure there's lots of people can help if we do it that way. I'm more interested now in less disk-bound workloads, so TPC-E is good. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
