Zeugswetter Andreas SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually I am not sure whether the column = NULL syntax is even
> defined or allowed in SQL92
I've just checked, by reading the relevant paragraphs and studying the
BNF, and the standard says that any comparison of the form X <comp op>
Y is unknown if X or Y (or both) is NULL, including the case where
NULL is given as an explicit constant. So, SQL92 clearly demands that
"column = NULL" is UNKNOWN, never TRUE or FALSE.
-tih
--
The basic difference is this: hackers build things, crackers break them.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- AW: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] behavior of ' = NULL' vs. M... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] behavior of ' = NU... Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] behavior of ' ... Stephan Szabo
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] behavior o... Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] behavi... Stephan Szabo
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] behavior of ' ... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] behavior o... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] behavi... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] b... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] behavi... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] behavior of ' = NU... Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] behavior of ' = NU... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: [SQL] behavior o... Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: [SQL] behavior o... Tom Lane
