Tom Lane wrote: > Aside from the semantic-gap issue, there is the point that providing > a cast might actually mask application errors. I can well imagine > cases where one of the reasons for using MONEY is *exactly* that it's > not a plain number or easily convertible to one.
I'm always against casts, but I can hardly object to an explicit cast between money and numeric. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
