Greg Smith wrote: > It's good this came up, because that is factually wrong; while the average > case is much better some OS-dependant aspects of the spike (what happens at > fsync) are certainly still there. I think it's easier to rewrite this > whole thing so it's technically accurate rather than a simple fix of the > wording, something like this: > > "Checkpoint writes can be spread over a longer time period to smooth the > I/O spike during each checkpoint"
Thanks, I changed it to this. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.advogato.org/person/alvherre "No necesitamos banderas No reconocemos fronteras" (Jorge González) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
