Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I figured it would make sense if pgarch.c used the same mechanism that > postmaster.c uses to report the various variants of regular and signal > exits.
Hmm. Getting rid of the "(PID 0)" is going to be a mess enough for translations that I think it is worth pgarch.c having its own routine for this. Furthermore I think the detailed archive command should be reported in an errdetail() field, which makes it even farther off. (Hmm, there is nearly duplicate code in pclose_check already). -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34J "Nunca confiaré en un traidor. Ni siquiera si el traidor lo he creado yo" (Barón Vladimir Harkonnen) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match