Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I figured it would make sense if pgarch.c used the same mechanism that
> postmaster.c uses to report the various variants of regular and signal
> exits.

Hmm.  Getting rid of the "(PID 0)" is going to be a mess enough for
translations that I think it is worth pgarch.c having its own routine
for this.  Furthermore I think the detailed archive command should be
reported in an errdetail() field, which makes it even farther off.

(Hmm, there is nearly duplicate code in pclose_check already).

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                 http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34J
"Nunca confiaré en un traidor.  Ni siquiera si el traidor lo he creado yo"
(Barón Vladimir Harkonnen)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to