> > Yeah, I think it would be useful to log one message if after (say) 5 > > seconds we still haven't been able to open the file. > > Either that, or on the first run.
Imho 1-5s is better, so that would be after the 10-50th try. > loop. It's supposed to loop 300 times. Yes. > > (Are we OK with the idea of sleeping 1 second each time?) > > I think not. 0.1 seconds is better. We don't want to delay a full second if > it's just a transient thing. Yes 0.1 s is imho good. Btw. m$ is talking about milliseconds (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316609) Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
