Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 17:29 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> then a subsequent postmaster start could initiate a second archiver >>> process which would cause issues with whatever the first archiver is >>> doing. >> >> That's a problem that the archiver itself should fix (perhaps it needs >> its own lockfile).
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-05/msg00920.php I thought that sounded familiar ;-). What was the outcome of that discussion? No patch for this ever got applied AFAICS. The patch as posted had a few issues, per the thread, and I don't see a followup version. (The alleged replacement patch did something else entirely.) regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
