Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm still not very happy with any of the options here. > > > BAS is great if you didn't want to trash the cache, but its also > > annoying to people that really did want to load a large table into > > cache. However we set it, we're going to have problems because not > > everybody has the same database. > > That argument leads immediately to the conclusion that you need > per-table control over the behavior. Which maybe you do, but it's > far too late to be proposing it for 8.3. We should put this whole > area of more-control-over-BAS-and-syncscan on the TODO agenda.
Another question --- why don't we just turn off synchronized_seqscans when we do COPY TO? That would fix pg_dump and be transparent. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
