Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 schrieb Alvaro Herrera: > >> Effect: we would stop receiving complaints that an old pg_dump can talk > >> to a server that most likely is incompatible with it. People would > >> learn on the spot that they must install the newer pg_dump. > > > I think a more moderate measure might be to clarify the error message > > "aborting because of version mismatch (Use the -i option to proceed > > anyway.)\n" > > I would be satisfied with that if I thought people would actually read > the message. My complaint is really directed at certain admin packages > (and they know who they are) that invoke pg_dump *by default*, behind > the user's back, with -i.
Oh? That isn't good. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match