"Tom Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This seems like a good enough opportunity to mention an idea that I > had while/after doing the enum patch. The patch was fairly intrusive > for something that was just adding a type because postgresql isn't > really set up for parameterized types other than core types. The idea > would be to extend the enum mechanism to allow UDTs etc to be > parameterized, and enums would just become one use of the mechanism.
Isn't this reasonably well covered by Teodor's work to support typmods for user-defined types? We've discussed how the typmod could be effectively a key into a system catalog someplace, thus allowing it to represent more than just an int32 worth of stuff. I'm not seeing where your proposal accomplishes more than that can. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly