Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm seeing a 8.3 database whose autovacuum-initiated vacuums are being > > cancelled and I am not sure of the cause. I am wondering if a HOT > > cleanup round on a page could try to acquire locks on it that would > > conflict with autovacuum (basically anything that conflicts with a > > vacuum lock). This would cause autovacuum to commit hara-kiri. > > This is nonsense, no? A buffer cleanup lock is an LWLock not a lock > manager lock.
Yeah, I realized that after awhile. There must be something else they are doing. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your Subscription: http://mail.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr?domain=postgresql.org&extra=pgsql-hackers
