bruce wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 20:33:08 -0500 (EST) > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Added to TODO based on this discussion: > > > > > > o Allow pg_dump to utilize multiple CPUs and I/O channels by > > > dumping multiple objects simultaneously > > > > > > The difficulty with this is getting multiple dump processes > > > to produce a single dump output file. > > > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00205.php > > > > Isn't part of this problem also a consistent snapshot? > > Yes, that might also be an issue though I thought we had some ideas > about snapshot sharing.
OK, I have added the possible requirement of shared snapshots to that pg_dump TODO item. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your Subscription: http://mail.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr?domain=postgresql.org&extra=pgsql-hackers
