"Pavan Deolasee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The WIP patch looks good to me. I haven't yet tested it (will wait for the
> final version). The following pointer arithmetic caught my eye though.
> !   nunused = (end - nowunused);
> Shouldn't we typecast them to (char *) first ?

No ... we want the number of OffsetNumbers, not the number of bytes.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to