"Pavan Deolasee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The WIP patch looks good to me. I haven't yet tested it (will wait for the > final version). The following pointer arithmetic caught my eye though. > ! nunused = (end - nowunused); > Shouldn't we typecast them to (char *) first ?
No ... we want the number of OffsetNumbers, not the number of bytes. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers