Gregory Stark wrote:
"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Magnus Hagander wrote:
We are sucking a lot of this data down to the db on search.postgresql.org already. Does it make sense to do it there perhaps? Is there need for anything more than a unique-messageid-hit? If that's all we need, we could easily have an url like http://search.postgresql.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] redirect to the proper page on archives?
Agreed, we just need search to index the message-id line and we can link
to that easily.

I would very much like such a URL as well. At a guess it would require hacking
the tsearch parser we use for the search engine on the web site?

No, it requires hacking the indexing script, and we'll store the messageid in it's own column in the table.

//Magnus

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to