"Greg Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, KaiGai Kohei wrote: > >> I'll submit the proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches again, because some of >> previous >> messages are filtered due to attachment and I cannot provide whole of >> patches yet. > > This is actually what you should have done from the beginning. And it only > should have gone to the pgsql-hackers list, which is the only one I'm replying > to. Your patches are at this point a proposal, as you say in the subject, and > those go to the pgsql-hackers list with the minimum of files necessary to > support them. pgsql-patches is generally aimed at patches that have already > been discussed on the hackers list, ones that are basically ready to apply to > the source code.
Some people shout any time you send patches to -hackers. For the -patches is there mainly to catch large attachments regardless of their maturity. But it's true that it's best to post a plan and have discussion prior to developing big patches. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
