Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Breaking the type_sanity test is not acceptable. Put in a second C
>> function.
> Are you talking opr_sanity?
Sorry, yes, too little caffeine ...
> What is evil with a polymorphic function?
(1) It's creating a false match --- your proposed entry in the opr_sanity
results has nothing at all to do with what the test is looking for.
(2) Refactoring to have two separate C functions will make the code
clearer, and not noticeably longer.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
