Zdeněk Kotala wrote:
Andrew Dunstan napsal(a):
Zdeněk Kotala wrote:
Question is also how many users really use these commands. For
example vacuumdb is not too important now when we have autovacuum.
This is not true. Plenty of apps will quite reasonably choose to
follow large batch updates by a single vacuumdb rather than using
autovacuum.
Yes, up to 8.2, but I think situation for 8.3 could be different. We
have more works, autovacuum is better and so on.
Again, this is just not true. It might not be a situation you run
across, but autovacuum does not suit all needs. This includes 8.3.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers