Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uh, I think based on other usage it should be called client_statement().
That is *exactly* the wrong thing, because "statement" specifically
means one SQL statement.
"client_query" seems about the best compromise I've heard so far.
It's too bad we didn't have this debate before pg_stat_activity got out
into the wild, because it's now too late to rename its column
current_query. Possibly we should stick with current_query() just
for consistency with that view ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
