Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >> Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > >>> I think the agreement was that dblink_current_query was to be > > >>> implemented on top of this. In fact I don't see any reason not to.
> OK. Did someone mention this before because I don't remember it and the > patch removed the dblink usage. Do we continue to document the > function? Yes, I did: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-05/msg00098.php -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
