Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> I agree with that, but I think your idea of not making the pg_shdepend > >> entries is a pointless and possibly dangerous micro-optimization. > >> How much actual speedup would it provide, anyway? > > > Speedup? Not sure -- I'm more worried about catalog bloat for people > > who create lots of temp tables. > > They're going to have far more bloat in pg_class, pg_attribute, etc.
But these are not shared catalogs. > A more useful thing to do to save catalog bloat would be to stop storing > the 100%-predictable pg_attribute entries for system columns --- that'd > save six or seven rows per table, not just one. Agreed. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
