-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I think there is concern that trivial patches wouldn't be submitted to a > patch tracker, especially by new submitters. Again, I am willing to > track the ones that aren't in the patch tracker, but then we have two > places where patches exist (perhaps three with the wiki).
For new submitters, there's always going to be some set of hoops to jump through. Whether it's emailing -patches, adding a ticket to a Trac or bugzilla, or adding a wiki entry, there will be some process that they need to conform to if they want their patch to get reviewed. Personally I don't feel that using a patch tracker or wiki is any more onerous than using an email list, and it's a whole lot more responsive (i.e., doesn't require Bruce to personally and manually shift the entry from -patches to the queue). It's not like we'd be asking submitters to draw a chalk circle on their floor and conduct an arcane ritual. =) It's just a website. Cheers, BJ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iD8DBQFH/XU55YBsbHkuyV0RAg5DAJ9faAwOxlGPGmqkroHLjwkDpE0lWwCfcMrH dDHcBjpQy5uspFljnv463/k= =1Tuq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
