On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Jonah H. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've run into a couple cases now where it would be helpful to easily > > > assign an already-existing unique index as a primary key. > > > > You need to present a more convincing use-case than this unsupported > > assertion. There's hardly any effective difference between a unique > > index + NOT NULL constraints and a declared primary key ... so what > > did you really need it for? > > Agreed, functionally there's not much of a difference. It's more of a > matter of proper design identifying a primary key. >
set right constraints it's good for documenting the system itself, i like the idea... -- regards, Jaime Casanova -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
