Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> A bigger issue is whether this is worth applying when nobody seems to be >> working on either of the main uses for it (bitmap indexes and GIT >> indexes). There seemed to be some possible marginal use for it in GIST >> indexes, but I'm not convinced that's a sufficient reason to complicate >> the APIs.
> It has some merit on its own. Yeah, and Teodor's point about cleaning up the @@@ hack pretty much seals the deal for me. Unless anyone has objections, I will review and apply Heikki's patch http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-03/msg00163.php which covers both the amgetmulti return-a-bitmap change and the candidate-matches change. (Heiiki, you don't have a later version of that do you?) The remaining topics associated with index AMs are closed for this commit fest, unless anyone has specific questions they want discussed right now... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
