Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andrew Chernow escribi?: > > > > This patch has been lingering around since Aug 2007. It has matured a > > lot and now calls libpq home. Unfortunately, ISTM that there is limited > > support for our proposal. We either pitched to the wrong crowd or > > pqtypes doesn't have the mass appeal we expected. With that said, we > > are considering shopping this elsewhere ... ie. pgfoundry. > > I expect you intend to get at least the hooks in, right?
No, I don't think so based on what he said. Even to add the hooks to libpq we would need to have more community demand than we have seen, which I think is what he is alluding to in his email. I think they have come upon the right answer, and that is to develop a version on pgfoundry and see if they can get user demand for a more invasive addition to our core code at some point in the future. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
