Brendan Jurd wrote: > > OK. FYI, what would be really nice would be for someone to review and > > apply the patch or give the author feedback so we could avoid adding it > > to the wiki at all. > > Bruce, > > Yes, that would be nice! But not likely in practice, unless your > patch happens to immediately catch the interest of a suitably > qualified person with commit privileges. > > However, I don't know of any way the maintenance of the wiki is an > addition to your workload. I feel that the onus of adding the patch > to the wiki should be on the submitter, and we've already had some > success getting submitters to add their own patches. And Alvaro has > already offered to pick up the slack in cases where the submitter > fails to add their patch to the queue. > > Every patch that somebody else adds to the wiki is another patch you > don't have to add to your queue, so how can this be anything but a > plus for you?
Yes, but unless people actually applies patches from the wiki, it doesn't help me --- adding patches to my queue is zero cost for me. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
