Bruce Momjian wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Maybe this means that we should give pgindent a run over the back > > branches. > > Yea, that thought has crossed our minds, but the problem is that there > is little testing of back branches so it would be risky.
That's a fair point, though I wonder how can a code indenter be so broken that it broke code in ways not detected by our buildfarm. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
