Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Sorry if I missed it in the original thread, but what is the use case > you have in mind?
I think the bottom line is just that having statement_timeout a global setting is stupid for a variety of reasons (dump, restore, vacuum, locks, incidental delays) that we should discourage it (or prevent it, as proposed elsewhere) rather than working around it in countless individual places. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
