Aidan Van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080417 20:11]: >> Ouch, that's a real good point. Maybe a certain amount of platform >> dependence is inevitable.
> I don't get it. If they are used as typedefs *anywhere* in the PG > source, they're needed in the typedef list. Right, but if the only use is inside #ifdef __BRAND_X_PLATFORM__, the only way for the proposed toolchain to extract that usage is if someone runs it on BRAND_X_PLATFORM. Of course, for seldom-used platforms maybe we don't care that much. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers