* Brendan Jurd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080509 14:43]: > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brendan Jurd escribió: > >> I for one would definitely like backslash commands with very wide > >> output to be wrapped by default. > > > > (At least) one place where I would not like it is in \df+, because > > wrapped function output would be more difficult to read. > > > > I am a bit conflicted about wrapping on \df. I agree that wrapped > function code is difficult to read, but what we've got now is > difficult to read too. Which of the two is more difficult is really a > matter of personal taste. I guess with \df you have to accept that > it's always going to be ugly, unless you have a very wide terminal (or > very short function definitions!).
Isn't that what $PAGER is for? $PAGER is the main reason why *I* don't want the wrapped format. a. -- Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god, [EMAIL PROTECTED] command like a king, http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
