Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 18:58 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

No, it had to do with pg_standby waiting for a WAL file that had already gone, somehow. I will try to reproduce it when I get a spare moment.

Sounds like the bug I just fixed.


Yes, so I see. I didn't have that fix, so I'll test again with the patch.
There is an outstanding Windows issue with pg_standby that your help
would be appreciated with, shown on latest commitfest page. It's a
Windows issue and I don't maintain a Windows dev environment.

The patch has been rejected for now, according to the Commitfest page. Not sure what you want my help on.

Well, the patch was rejected long ago, not sure why its in this
commitfest. But its an open issue on the Windows port.


Surely the right fix is to use the recently implemented pgwin32_safestat() (if we aren't already - I suspect we probably are) and remove the kluge in pg_standby.c.

cheers

andrew

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to