On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 23:06 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2008/5/21 Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 13:31 -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote: > >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> In my proposal I don't create any default variables. Result type is > >> >> only virtual - I don't need write it to system directory. I thing it's > >> >> better than using some specific predeclared type as RESULTTYPE OR > >> >> RESULTSET. > >> > > >> > How is this different from using OUT params and RETURNS SETOF RECORD ? > >> > >> *) you reference output variables via rowtype (r.var vs. var) > > > > As I'm currently working on updating another pl (pl/python), I'd like to > > know how will this affect get_call_result_type() defined in funcapi.h. > > will there be an extra parameter for record name there ? > > no
why not ? do you think that other pl languages won't need it ? --------------- Hannu -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
