Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dave Page wrote: >> Yes, we're talking real-time streaming (synchronous) log shipping.
> That's not what Tom's email said, AIUI. Sorry, I was a bit sloppy about that. If we go with a WAL-shipping solution it would be pretty easy to support both synchronous and asynchronous cases (synchronous == master doesn't report commit until the WAL is down to disk on the slaves too). There are different use-cases for both so it'd make sense to do both. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers